|
www.times.org
©2003 Cascadia Times
BC Forests Under Siege
Canada’s Leaky Life Raft
by Paul Koberstein
A decade ago, Canada
led the global fight to preserve biological diversity. Canada was
the first nation to sign the International Convention on Biodiversity
at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992, and was the
first industrialized nation to ratify it. So what has Canada done
since then to back up its words with action? Almost nothing.
In fact, British Columbia
— the nation's most biologically diverse province —
has significantly weakened protection for all wildlife species since
1992. And, in the case of the beleaguered northern spotted owl,
the BC government’s own logging operations are are at least
partly to blame for the owl’s slide toward oblivion.
The mission of the Convention on Biodiversity was to halt the mass
extinctions that have been occurring in recent decades, caused almost
exclusively by the reduction and degradation of habitat through
human activities such as deforestation, intensive agriculture, and
urbanization.
“Canada recognized that stemming the accelerating loss of
biodiversity would require concerted and cooperative action by the
nations of the world, and that it was in our best interest, as a
nation, to assist other countries in achieving this end,”
wrote the late Arthur Campeau, who headed the Canadian delegation
in the negotiations for the Convention on Biodiversity.
But living up to that pledge means Canada must also protect critical
wildlife habitat within its borders, which the country has not done.
For years, the Canadian Parliament found it difficult to pass even
a weak endangered species law. Twice Parliament voted down the legislation.
Finally, in December 2002 the Parliament passed the “Species
at Risk Act,” which prompted David Anderson, Minister of the
Environment, to claim Canada’s endangered species were now
safe: “Today we fulfilled a commitment made by this government
to ensure protection for species at risk and the places where they
live. Protecting species at risk is a shared responsibility of all
governments in Canada. This Act ensures the federal responsibility
is met, and it also helps to fulfill some of Canada's international
obligations under the Biodiversity Convention.”
But the new law, which takes effect in June 2003, offers almost
no protection for habitat other than habitat used by migratory bird
species and salmon. For most other species, the new law prohibits
killing a listed species or its nest or den, but fails to protect
any habitat unless the land is owned by the federal government.
But this is a red herring.
Unlike the US, where federal ownership dominates, most of Canada
is owned by the provinces.
In British Columbia the federal government owns just 1 percent
of all forests. The province owns 95 percent. BC has no law providing
any special protection for endangered species habitat, and its general
wildlife protection laws have been severely weakened recently by
the new BC government under Premier Gordon Campbell.
The consensus among scientists is that Canada’s Species at
Risk Act will “do virtually nothing” to halt most imperiled
species, says Dr. Brian Horejsi, a grizzly bear expert at the University
of Alberta in Calgary. “The biggest roadblock to any remote
possibility of effectiveness is it applies only to federal lands,
and there are almost no federal lands in Canada.”
Grizzly bears, northern spotted owls, mountain caribou and many
other animals “are almost completely defenseless in the context
of this federal legislation,” Horejsi says.
The new law also fails to protect transboundary species —
defined as species that roam between the US and Canada. “The
federal government has completely abdicated its responsibility,”
says Gwen Barlee of the Western Canada Wilderness Committee. “Courts
have clearly stated that transboundary species are under federal
jurisdiction. This law is astoundingly weak.”
“Habitat loss is the primary cause of species loss and decline
yet habitat protection under the bill comes 'too little, too late'
to ensure species and habitat protection,” said Kate Smallwood
of the Endangered Species Coalition in Canada.
Smallwood said the new law also provides no timetable for completing
plans to recover endangered species.
In 2001, more than 1,400 scientists in North America signed a letter
saying Canada's remarkable biodiversity is at risk. The Committee
on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, the body responsible
for determining the national status of species, has identified 402
at-risk species. It will add more names to the list as studies are
completed.
Not that it will necessarily make any difference.
|